DeepInfra vs SiliconFlow — Qwen3 32B
At $0.4 per 1M tokens for both input and output, this pricing is mid-tier for a 32B parameter model, with a throughput of 560 tok/s indicating fast performance. The rate limits of 15,000 TPM and 60 RPM are more suited for low-volume prototyping, while the first-token latency of 290 ms favors batch use over real-time applications.
This tier is suitable for a batch document processing pipeline with a small team handling <50k daily completions, requiring moderate latency.
The input and output costs are both $0.14 per 1M tokens, which positions this API tier at a mid-range price point for its model class, while the throughput of 540 tok/s is relatively fast. The rate limits of 30,000 TPM and 60 RPM suggest suitability for low-volume prototyping rather than high-volume production, and the first-token latency of 310 ms favors batch use over real-time applications.
This API tier is suitable for a batch document processing workload with a small team scale, targeting <50k daily completions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is DeepInfra faster than SiliconFlow for Qwen3 32B?
DeepInfra delivers 560 tokens/sec at 290ms TTFT, while SiliconFlow delivers 540 tokens/sec at 310ms TTFT. DeepInfra has higher throughput; DeepInfra has lower first-token latency.
Is DeepInfra cheaper than SiliconFlow for Qwen3 32B?
DeepInfra charges $0.4 input / $0.4 output per 1M tokens. SiliconFlow charges $0.14 input / $0.14 output per 1M tokens. SiliconFlow is cheaper for input-heavy workloads.
What are the rate limits for DeepInfra vs SiliconFlow?
DeepInfra enforces 15,000 TPM / 60 RPM. SiliconFlow enforces 30,000 TPM / 60 RPM. Higher TPM limits allow more concurrent users before hitting API ceilings.
Does DeepInfra or SiliconFlow offer a free tier?
DeepInfra offers a free tier. SiliconFlow offers a free tier. Both are suitable for prototyping without a credit card.