Groq vs SiliconFlow — Llama 3.3 70B
The input cost is $0.59 / 1M tokens and the output cost is $0.79 / 1M tokens, which positions this API tier as mid-range for its model class, while the throughput of 750 tok/s is fast. With rate limits of 6,000 TPM and 30 RPM, this setup is more suited for low-volume prototyping, and the first-token latency of 250 ms favors batch use over real-time applications.
This API tier is suitable for a low-volume prototyping team working on a batch document processing pipeline with <50k daily completions.
The input and output costs are both $0.14 per 1M tokens, positioning this API tier in the mid-range for cost-efficiency, while the throughput of 680 tok/s is relatively fast for this model class. With rate limits of 30,000 TPM and 60 RPM, these constraints are more suited for low-volume prototyping rather than high-volume production, and the 300 ms first-token latency is more favorable for batch use than real-time applications.
This API tier is suitable for a team of 2-5 engineers working on a batch document processing pipeline with a volume tier of <50k daily completions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Groq faster than SiliconFlow for Llama 3.3 70B?
Groq delivers 750 tokens/sec at 250ms TTFT, while SiliconFlow delivers 680 tokens/sec at 300ms TTFT. Groq has higher throughput; Groq has lower first-token latency.
Is Groq cheaper than SiliconFlow for Llama 3.3 70B?
Groq charges $0.59 input / $0.79 output per 1M tokens. SiliconFlow charges $0.14 input / $0.14 output per 1M tokens. SiliconFlow is cheaper for input-heavy workloads.
What are the rate limits for Groq vs SiliconFlow?
Groq enforces 6,000 TPM / 30 RPM. SiliconFlow enforces 30,000 TPM / 60 RPM. Higher TPM limits allow more concurrent users before hitting API ceilings.
Does Groq or SiliconFlow offer a free tier?
Groq offers a free tier. SiliconFlow offers a free tier. Both are suitable for prototyping without a credit card.